Dracula, Bram Stoker (1897)


“We are in Transylvania; and Transylvania is not England. Our ways are not your ways, and there shall be to you many strange things.”


Reading Dracula was like reading Little Women. Steeped in the film versions, I thought I knew what I would find in the books. Both were a surprise, even though I know films always change things and leave out a lot. When will I learn not to judge a book by a film?

Dracula is told entirely through the journals of four of the six principal players: Mina Murray, whose best friend Lucy Westenra has become mysteriously sick; Johnathan Harker, Mina’s fiancé then husband; the psychiatrist Dr. Seward, who runs a mental institute and Professor Van Helsing of Amsterdam, Seward’s former professor who is an “obscure diseases” specialist. Lucy’s two suitors, Arthur Holmwood, later Lord Godalming and the American Quincey Morris, make up the final six.

There is literally no straight narrative in the structure of the book. Stoker uses detailed journal entries, newspaper clippings, letters, bills of lading to tell the story. I found this to be extremely effective, because by keeping things in the first person, the story has immediacy and suspense as one ‘scene’ cuts away to another and we see how each experience is seen and interpreted in multiple ways. While this device is sometimes distracting or hard to follow here, each character has a distinct and unique voice, which makes it easy to know which character is writing.

Because I am used to film and popular culture portrayals of Dracula I was shocked at how little Count Dracula personally features in the book. In addition to his human persona he shape-shifts into various creatures, but is mostly absent. The book is really about the quest to find and kill him. It is the lore around vampires, the ancient curse that shows up in the superstitious townspeople, the effect of vampire bites on Lucy and Mina and the knowledge Professor Van Helsing has that forms the story.

In film versions, the suave and charming Count is afforded lots of screen time with special effects liberally showcasing his pointed teeth, lips dripping with blood, the (Bela Lugosi’s) famous accent, the bat persona and the abundance of mist whenever he is about to appear. While in these versions he is sometimes portrayed as a sympathetic character in the book he is an evil creature without any redeeming qualities living only to satisfy his evil desires without regard to the human cost.

I was struck by the technological inventions Stoker makes use of that existed at the end of the 19th century.  They remind me of H.G. Wells and Jules Verne and seem to fit right in with today’s Steampunk subculture.

  1. Blood transfusions are given to Lucy as Dracula’s fatal bite causes her body to waste away. Dr. Seward transfuses her with Arthur, Quincey, Van Helsing and himself (without knowledge of blood type?) with limited results.
  2. The typewriter: When it is discovered that Mina is an expert typist, she types up everyone’s journal, in copies, so as to give a cohesive structure as to what each is experiencing; she also types up the notes of their planning meetings.
  3. The dictaphone: Dr. Seward speaks his journal into this machine that records on a record player, which Mina types up.
  4. The London Underground and train schedules: Mina is obsessed with the train schedules of the Underground and suburban/cross country trains and has their timetables memorized.
  5. Hypnotism: In an effort to find the whereabouts of Dracula Professor Van Helsing hypnotizes Mina frequently at sunrise and sunset.

When Dracula flees London for his hometown in Romania, the six follow him knowing they must ritually kill him by stabbing him through the heart and cutting off his head. This is the only way to stop a vampiric future and to save Mina, who although has not ‘changed’ yet, is exhibiting some debilitating symptoms.

As they plan and prepare for their journey in Dr. Seward’s living room, Mina makes a disturbing, but necessary request, of which they all must swear. If she becomes so changed that she poses a threat to herself or to them, they must “drive a stake through me and cut off my head.” And in a scene reminiscent of something out of a Medieval romance where knights on a quest pledge their honor to their lady, the men faithfully drop to their knees one by one and swear, as (“Lady”) Mina asks, to kill her if they are unable to ritually rid the world of Dracula so her soul may rest.

Quincey was the first…He knelt down before her and taking her hand in his said solemnly, “ I am only a rough fellow…but I swear to you by all that I hold sacred and dear that, should the time ever come, I shall not flinch from the duty that you have set us.” And each in turn makes the same vow.

Mention should be made here of Mina. She disparages the ‘New Woman,’ of their independence, their call to buck social convention. Yet, she herself is the prime example of such a woman: smart, intelligent, technologically savvy whose work is key in organizing and pursuing the search for Dracula. It is Mina whose facility with a typewriter and organizational skills, her intelligence and coping mechanism in the face of the horror that is happening to her, her obsession with train schedules that basically saves the day. And apparently, she is also an expert on the the criminal mind through the work of Max Nordau, which Stoker, in a bizarre “show and tell” scene, has her recite his philosophy about criminals in reference to Dracula’s own criminality. The irony of this anti-New Woman aspect about Mina is probably not lost on most readers, so it is curious.

The last quarter of the book does feel to me like knights on a sacred quest to rid the world of evil like Arthur and his knights, or Harry, Ron and Hermione against He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, and of all the films and books where ordinary people band together against the darkness that would overcome humanity.

Sadly, unlike the notoriety of these epic stories, this particular one will forever stay with the six, because it is too fantastical. No one would ever believe them.

When we got home we got to talking of the old time—which we could all look back upon without despair… I took the papers from the safe where they have been ever since our return so long ago. We were struck with the fact, that in all the mass of material of which the record is composed, there is hardly one authentic document; nothing but a mass of type-writing, except the later notebooks of Mina and Seward and myself, and Van Helsing’s memorandum. We could hardly ask anyone, even did we wish to, to accept these as proofs of so wild a story.

I didn’t find Dracula scary. I found it hopeful and encouraging. And nothing like the films….


My Edition
Title: Dracula
Author: Bram Stoker
Publisher: Barnes and Noble Classics
Device: Trade paperback
Year: 1897
Pages: 400
Full plot summary

Challenges: Mount TBR, Classics Club, Back to the Classics, #RIPXII

25 thoughts on “Dracula, Bram Stoker (1897)

  1. Pingback: 5 Years/50 Books-My Completed Classics Club List | Relevant Obscurity

  2. J.E. Fountain

    I just read this for the first time, and really enjoyed it. I expected it to be different than most film renditions, and even though I knew overall plot and outcome, I still found it gripping. Nice review.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: Looking Toward 2018 – Relevant Obscurity

  4. Great review! I also enjoyed the epistolary style and the interesting use of technology. And I don’t think I’ve seen a movie about Dracula that even pretends to follow the original, but I was still surprised we didn’t see more of Dracula in the book.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree that one of the most surprising things was how little Dracula is actually featured in the book.

      I am now trying to get through Francis Fort Coppola’s Dracula and it is awful for so many reasons, especially for how MUCH he features his own concept of Dracula. Ick…

      Liked by 1 person

  5. It has been a few years since I read this, but I do remember thinking it would be sexier due to the film and TV adaptations I’d previously watched. Instead, like you mention, Dracula is simply a monster in this novel with absolutely no elements of sympathy, romance or sexiness! These changes in film and TV adaptations perhaps says a lot about how we have changed as a society.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I had the same reaction when I read Dracula for last year’s RIP. I’d previously never got past the scenes in the Count’s castle.

    I had a similar reaction to Mina too – and sort of made my peace with her. I’ve never really found a film version of Mina that I’d warmed to before, but book Mina made me sympathise. I can’t say I liked her, I think because as you pointed out she disparages the new woman trend and is very much a good Victorian House Angel – but she is routinely the smartest person in the room. Had to admire her for that, and being so composed (and not throwing the tea service about) when all the men decide that it’s time to protect her.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh yes, the ‘we have to protect Mina’ scenes were definitely cringe worthy. And didn’t you just gape when the first time they did that they left her alone? You just knew she would be “visited!”

      I am not sure why this isn’t the case, but it seems to me ‘book Mina’ is a literary heroine who should be better known.


  7. I must have read this many, many years ago, as I’m sure what you’ve described is more familiar to me than the versions from the Gary Oldman film or even Nosferatu. Or perhaps it’s what I remembered from a biography of Stoker I read two or three decades ago! Anyway, another classic to ‘revisit’! Thanks 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  8. I had forgotten so much about the book – thanks for the lovely reminder! I’m currently re-reading Frankenstein – listening to it, in fact, with Derek Jacobi narrating. It’s also very different from most of the films, although the Kenneth Branagh version stuck pretty close to the book from what I remember. I second the recommendation for Le Fanu’s Carmilla – the story from which all the modern vampire fiction flows… 😀

    Liked by 2 people

  9. It has been some years since I’ve read Dracula. I once got a ticking off from a librarian about getting this out as it was in the adult section. I was that kind of kid 🙂 I like literary connections when I go anywhere, and I’m planning a Whitby visit in the next couple of months. I think it’s a perfect time to reread Dracula.
    Ps don’t forget Le Fanu 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Pingback: R.I.P. XII Challenge-Late, but Enthused! – Relevant Obscurity

    1. I have yet to tackle Frankenstein, but I really liked your review.

      I suspect one reason film versions distort the greater messages in “monster books,” is because if you can use special effects, why not?!

      I think you will find these messages if you read Dracula.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Pingback: Dracula, Bram Stoker (1897) — Relevant Obscurity – horrorwriter

Let me know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.