Banned Books Week: The Witch of Blackbird Pond

My Edition:witchblackbird
Title: The Witch of Blackbird Pond
Author: Elizabeth George Speare
Publisher: Dell Yearling
Device: Trade paper
Year: 1958
Pages: 249
For a plot summary

I have chosen three young adult classics to read for Banned Books Week and one to review: The Witch of Blackbird Pond, A Wrinkle in Time and The Bridge to Terabithia. Each have been continually challenged or banned by parents and educational organizations since their dates of publication.

I have to say right off the mark this kind of behavior fascinates me. I grew up in a reading household where I freely took books off shelves at home and at my grandparents’ houses and I do not remember my parents ever telling me I couldn’t read something. My relationship with my parents was very open and no question, either personal or educational, was ever off limits. So I suppose if I read something that bothered me, I’d ask them. But I remember discussions, not banning. This is all to say my comments below question the reasons why The Witch of Blackbird Pond is a challenged book.

The Witch of Blackbird Pond is set in the late 1600s and tells the story of Kit, who grew up a carefree young girl on a wealthy plantation in Barbados. When she is suddenly orphaned, she sails to Wethersfield, Connecticut to live with her mother’s sister, her husband and their two daughters in their strict Puritan home. She is not used to doing chores and the work of a homestead, nor is she used to the stifled way of thinking which makes her feel like an outsider. She befriends the widow Hannah Tupper, an old Quaker woman shunned by the locals, who lives alone at the edge of the Great Meadow and who understands Kit’s feeling of estrangement. Her home becomes Kit’s refuge. But when the town’s children begin to fall ill, Hannah is accused of casting a spell on them and the townspeople come to take her away. Kit overhears their plans and runs to save Hannah, only to be accused of witchcraft herself.

The trial is harrowing because, once suspicion has been cast, enough townspeople are riled up sufficiently to press the officials “to deal with the witches” and as history has shown, the outcome is never good for the accused. In Hannah’s case, she was already under a great deal of suspicion just for being a Quaker, who didn’t go to (the Puritan) Meeting each week and who kept to herself. But in actuality, it was the townspeople who kept away from her, who never made an effort to know her, which allowed their imagination to fester. If they had visited, they would have seen her like Kit did, a kindhearted old lady who liked company, could spin a neat flax thread and made delicious corn and blueberry muffins.

Kit’s accusations were a little more complicated besides being “guilty” of associating with the Widow Tupper. There was the incident in the river, witnessed by several people of the town, when she jumped into the water to rescue a little girl’s doll. Though swimming was perfectly acceptable in Barbados, in the Colonies one of the tests for women accused of witchcraft was to see if they could float. Only if they sank did that prove their innocence. But the biggest charge against Kit was discovered in a child’s hornbook, where her name was written multiple times and was believed to be the spell or incantation that made the children sick. Fortunately, this was resolved when the little girl came forward to describe how Kit taught her how to write her name by writing it out so she could copy it. She proved right there in front of the officials she was a masterful copier, because her hand looked just like Kit’s. This emboldened some of the townspeople to come to the women’s defense and the charges against them were dropped.

This book has been challenged for promoting witchcraft and violence. But the real threat should be that it promotes ignorance, prejudice and gossip mongering. Ironically, there is no actual witchcraft in the book. It is only in the perceived notion that an old woman alone, living on the edge of town with a cat (that is not even black, btw) must be up to no good. And that when disease breaks out among the town’s children, suspicion turns on this outsider; a condition the town made itself by shunning her in the first place. The dangers of gossip, estrangement, ignorance, and beliefs about a person where there is no proof, not witchcraft, are the real lessons of the book.

And violence? The townspeople came after Hannah and burned down her home and tried to kill her cat. Instead of wanting to ban this book for violence, isn’t this another lesson of how ignorance and prejudice can get out of hand? Once you shun a neighbor and cast her as an outsider who is “not like us,” you can make her responsible for anything.

This book was published in 1958, and it is remarkable or maybe somewhat sad that it still has a message for us today. We live in a world that still practices hate mongering, racism, the shunning of people because of their “lifestyle” or culture, of people who would rather take a video than stop the crime, and there are people and institutions who have turned gossip into an art form. Is any of this productive? Does it moves us forward as a people? Far from being a book that should be banned, The Witch of Blackbird Pond needs to be read and studied for its timely lessons for young people and adults alike.

(Elizabeth George Speare was an award-winning writer of historical fiction for young people. She won the Newberry Medal for both The Witch of Blackbird Pond and The Bronze Bow, which takes place during the time of Jesus. Her attention to the details of daily life draw you into the world of her characters and the history they are living.

She is famously quoted after receiving an award,  “I believe that all of us who are concerned with children are committed to the salvaging of Love and Honor and Duty.”)



12 thoughts on “Banned Books Week: The Witch of Blackbird Pond

  1. Pingback: The Bronze Bow, Elizabeth George Speare (1961) | Relevant Obscurity

  2. Pingback: Reading New England Round-up: October 2016 | The Emerald City Book Review

  3. I loved this book as a child. It’s bizarre to hear it’s been banned for promoting witchcraft and violence – as you say, it’s really about just the opposite. However, book banners are not noted for their tolerance or rational thinking.

    My reading lately has made me more aware of other aspects of colonial life that are not highlighted in children’s books from this era. Kit’s carefree plantation life in the West Indies would have been supported by an incredibly cruel system of slave labor. Yet while she fights the oppression of a single Quaker woman, she doesn’t seem bothered by that of thousands of black people. True to the time, perhaps, but it’s a sad reminder of how freedom and slavery are so intertwined in our history.


    • Your point is well taken about slavery. When Kit meets her aunt and uncle and explains what happened to her parents and that after her grandfather died everything was sold to pay his debts, she says, “To pay my way on the ship I had to sell my own Negro girl.” Which reminded me that white girls were often given their own slave at some point in their young lives and to Kit, who grew up on an island and probably didn’t know better, never blinked an eye that she OWNED A PERSON. But we do and this was a difficult passage to read as it probably was in 1958 when the book was published.

      However, I don’t think writers of fiction necessarily write for the edification of their characters, but for us the reader. We can see the inconsistencies, the hypocrisies they live that they don’t. Kit comes on the scene as a privileged white girl, who never had her beliefs questioned or ever questioned them herself. Who’s to say that after having the experience of prejudice and ignorance she is not affected in a larger way? That the woman Kit becomes, who is now living in a northern state, hears talk of abolition, knows Quakers, understands her own background more fully, will not be sparked into awareness and action?


  4. What a great pick for your Banned Book reading! This was one of my favorite books as a kid, and I distinctly remember the librarian putting it in my hands and telling me to “just try it, trust me” even though it looked kinda old. Little did I know that it was considered controversial in some circles!


  5. “The dangers of gossip, estrangement, ignorance, and beliefs about a person where there is no proof, not witchcraft, are the real lessons of the book.” I agree with this. I did not realize this was a banned book. I find that so surprising because the message is so clearly one of tolerance and denial of prejudice. Maybe that is the problem. People don’t want those things. My mom bought this book for me when I was about 10. I loved it then and I still love it now. I will have to find my copy and give it to my 11-year-old daughter.


    • Hi Jennifer! I totally agree with this: “the message is so clearly one of tolerance and denial of prejudice.” I sometimes think this kind of message gets lost in the details when people can’t see the larger picture. I wonder what I would have thought about the book if I read it at 10 or 11? How nice to have this to read and discuss with your daughter.


Let me know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.